翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Garcinia pedunculata
・ Garcinia prainiana
・ Garcinia pushpangadaniana
・ Garcinia pyrifera
・ Garbów, Łódź East County
・ Garbówek
・ Garce
・ Garcelle Beauvais
・ Garcelles-Secqueville
・ Garcelon Civic Centre
・ Garceno, Texas
・ Garces Memorial Circle
・ Garces Memorial High School
・ Garces National Forest
・ Garcete
Garcetti v. Ceballos
・ Garcha
・ Garcha Blair
・ Garchen Rinpoche
・ Garches
・ Garchidan
・ Garching (Munich U-Bahn)
・ Garching an der Alz
・ Garching bei München
・ Garching-Forschungszentrum (Munich U-Bahn)
・ Garching-Hochbrück
・ Garchitorena, Camarines Sur
・ Garchizy
・ Garchuk Lachit Garh
・ Garchy


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Garcetti v. Ceballos : ウィキペディア英語版
Garcetti v. Ceballos

''Garcetti v. Ceballos'', , is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant. The Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection.
== Background ==
Richard Ceballos had been employed since 1989 as a deputy district attorney for the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, which at the time was headed by Gil Garcetti. After the defense attorney in a pending criminal case contacted Ceballos about his motion to challenge a critical search warrant based on inaccuracies in the supporting affidavit, Ceballos conducted his own investigation and determined that the affidavit contained serious misrepresentations. Ceballos contacted the deputy sheriff who had sworn out the affidavit but was not satisfied by his explanations. Ceballos then communicated his findings to his supervisors and submitted a memorandum in which he recommended dismissal of the case. A meeting was subsequently held to discuss the affidavit with his superiors and officials from the sheriff's department, which Ceballos claimed became heated and accusatory of his role in handling the case. Despite Ceballos’ concerns, his supervisor decided to proceed with the prosecution. The criminal trial court held a hearing on the motion, during which Ceballos was called by the defense to recount his observations about the affidavit. The trial court nevertheless denied the motion and upheld the warrant.
Ceballos claimed that he was subsequently subjected to a series of retaliatory employment actions. These included reassignment to a different position, transfer to another courthouse, and denial of a promotion. He initiated an employment grievance, which was denied based on a finding that he had not suffered any retaliation.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Garcetti v. Ceballos」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.